Mr. Hoover and I
| Title: | Mr. Hoover and I |
| Year: | 1989 |
| Directors: | Emile de Antonio |
| Writers: | Emile de Antonio (writer) |
| Rating: | 6.2 | 25 votes |
| Languages: | English |
| Color: | Color |
| Country: | UK | USA |
| Company: | Channel Four Films |
| Genres: | Documentary | Biography |
| Comments: | |
| 1) For the most part, the documentaries of Emile De Antonio tend to beabstractand withdrawn from any sense of personal expression or feeling. Point ofOrder and In the Year of the Pig may have dialectic meanings that show theradical left wing politics of De Antonio, but the viewer never actuallyseesthe soul of De himself. After a brilliant and subversive career, De diedin1989, but he first completed his final act to the play of his life- Mr.Hoover and I. Mr. Hoover and I is an autobiography, there is no wayaroundthat, but it is a different form of autobiography. It is a biography ofimages and explanations all told behind the backdrop of the life ofJ.EdgarHoover and why not. It is Hoover and the establishment that he representsthat De fought for so many years against. Although De’s life had takenmanydifferent shapes- from art patron to radical filmmaker- one thing alwayshaunted him- the spectre of the establishment, an establishment thatpersonified itself through Hoover. Where the attacks of In the Year ofthePig and Point of Order arise from an intellectual sense of montage- theattacks in Hoover are direct. This is De telling us what he believes, notrelying on a montage of found army footage. Hoover presents the side ofDewe never see- the man- the man who loves his wife (wives), has hishaircut,likes to poke fun at himself ("anyone who knows me, knows that the onlytimeI empty my wallet is at a bar" on charges that he donated money to Sovietcauses), and most of all is a many of passion for what he believes in.Knowing that De passed away only months after finishing Hoover, it almostbrings tears to the eyes of harden De fans for it wasn’t until he left usthat we got to see the real Emile De Antonio. | |
A Lamb in Despair
| Title: | A Lamb in Despair |
| Year: | 1999 |
| Directors: | Tony Leung Siu Hung |
| Rating: | 4.9 | 55 votes |
| Languages: | Cantonese |
| Color: | Color |
| Country: | HongKong |
| Genres: | Thriller |
| Comments: | |
| 1) This film centres around a young chinese man who is deported from Americaafter being acused of several murders the authorities could not prove, itturns out that he was abused by his mother as a child. After contactinghisfather he goes on a killing spree, abducts numerous woman, tortures, beatsand eventually kills them.
One woman he forces her to kill a couple and their young son after heurinates on the woman, he forces the now catatonic woman to shrink wraptheboy then stab the woman to death. Yep this is nasty stuff with AnthonyWongwho usually plays notourious villians turns up as one of the good guys.Allthose who like Lucio Fulci films will reconise some of the music from CityOf The Living Dead. 2) This is a thriller that builds slowly. It works from a rather nasty premiseand doesn’t flinch. The viewer is presented with the difficult task ofwatching a serial killer slide deeper and deeper into a world of horror anddespair. The situations are gut wrenching and intense. Blood and gore areminimal. Possibly taking its name from the American film "Silence Of The Lambs",thisfilm from Hong Kong goes places that the American film didn’t dare. |
|
Mr. Holland's Opus
| Title: | Mr. Holland's Opus |
| Year: | 1995 |
| Tagline: | We are your symphony Mr. Holland. We are the melodies and the notes of your opus. We are the music of your life. |
| Directors: | Stephen Herek |
| Writers: | Patrick Sheane Duncan (written by) |
| Rating: | 7.1 | 16,078 votes |
| Languages: | English | AmericanSignLanguage |
| Color: | Color |
| Country: | USA |
| Company: | Hollywood Pictures |
| Genres: | Drama | Music |
| Plot: | |
| 1) Glenn Holland is a musician and composer who takes a teaching job to pay the rent while, in his ‘spare time’, he can strive to achieve his true goal – compose one memorable piece of music to leave his mark on the world. As Holland discovers ‘Life is what happens to you while you’re busy making other plans’ and as the years unfold the joy of sharing his contagious passion for music with his students becomes his new definition of success. 2) |
|
| Synopsis: | |
| Glenn Holland takes a job as a music teacher in order to have "free time" to compose. Getting involved with education was not something he had kept in mind when he accepted to teach Music Appreciation in a High School. Iris, the wife, and later the principal must keep pushing to get him really compromised to deal with the teenagers lack of interest in the music class. He learns he has the ability to spark passion for music when he explains that music "has to be fun" and come from inside to one of his students, unable to play properly the clarinet, she gets connected. Iris is pregnant and he feels the responsibilities as an additional obstacle to his plans as a composer. He discovers a talented student with great facilities to sing, and encourages her to go for her dream of being a professional singer. Glenn names "Rowena’s theme" his composition for her; she decides to go to New York right away because "it is now or never". She proposes he goes with her so he meets her on the bus station the night of her departure… | |
| Trivia: | |
Trivia items below here contain information that may give away important plot points. You may not want to read any further if you’ve not already seen this title.
|
|
| Goofs: | |
|
|
| Comments: | |
| 1) So many people have complained about the Gertrude Lang character (AliciaWitt), Holland’s interaction with her, and the purpose of the character,andI am simply amazed at the hostility.
1) "Playing the sunset" was Holland’s way of getting Gertrude to relax soshe could play the notes fluidly. They both knew that she didn’t soundprofessional, and wasn’t going to. The idea was to get her just above thelevel of making a fool of herself as she did the first time he called onherin class. Then she could, and did, perform in the band without draggingdownthe whole ensemble. 2) Her goal was not to be a professional musician. Did no one else hear herspeech about "I just wanted to be good at *something*"? She listed all thefabulous achievements of her parents and siblings, and concluded, "I’m theonly one who’s…" The missing word would have been "useless" or"worthless". Or "a failure". Thirty years later she’s the governor (not themayor!), because in 1966, Holland helped her gain confidence for the firsttime. 3) She wasn’t "wasting" Holland’s efforts by going into politics. Art,musicand theater education don’t exist solely to create professional artists,musicians and actors. They also exist to give young people an opportunityfor change and growth, even if they never use a paintbrushagain. I liked that plot twist. Almost every high school has an alumnus who hasachieved something in art or entertainment, but a lot of people sell onepainting or appear in one film and become a hero to their home town. Butthere are only fifty states, and it takes an extraordinary amount of driveto become governor of one of them. It’s unlikely that she would have takenthat first step towards empowerment without Holland. 2) The first time I saw this film was in the movie theater with one of mybestfriends–both of us musicians. By the time we left, both of us werebawlingour eyes out. This film is very touching and well done. Granted, there areaccuracy errors (every film has those) and I’ve noticed several complaintsabout the music in the final scene (why are people so nitpicky?). I had aband director much like Mr. Holland when I was in middle school, a man whostruggled at first as a teacher but soon became a beloved and inspiringdirector. Every time I watch this film I think of that man, and how hechanged my life for the better. It’s a movie I can truly relateto. Okay, enough reminiscing. 3) Richard Dreyfuss is outstanding (as is the whole cast) in this thoroughlyenjoyable film. I really liked it the first time, but with repeatedviewings, I’d say that this film got even better. It’s a littlepredictable, but so what? For me, it was impossible not to care aboutthesecharacters, and the ending was the perfect heartwarming note to go out on.It was rather funny as well, but my favourite thing about this movie wasthemusic. It seems only fitting, considering the importance of music to thisfilm, that it would have a great number of songs, but I was astonished byhow much I LOVED the music in this movie. All-in-all, this was acompletelysatisfying film, and I would call it a must-see. 4) It’s a MOVIE! I’m reading comments so vastly polarized to one extreme oranother so as not to be believed. Okay, I am a musician. I’ve been one on a professional level for over tenyears, both as a writer and performer. And I LOVED this movie (apologiestoall those pretentious ‘serious’ musicians out there). I enjoyed mytheatrical viewing and I have watched my DVD several times. Is MR. HOLLAND’S OPUS musically accurate? No, of course not, no more sothan STAR TREK paying attention to factual science and the laws ofphysics.But for the most part, nobody other than most of us ego-driven, high horsebound musician types will ever know it. Designed to have a broad appeal outside the aforementioned musicallyinclined crowd? Yes, but then so is nearly every movie to come out ofHollywood. It has to be palatable to a certain degree, and I believe thatthe much maligned "Play the sunset" scene is far more entertaining thanhaving Mr. Holland give us lengthy exposition on the proper articulationandtechnique that goes into playing a given instrument. And if I hear one more poster scream about Mr. Holland’s ‘opus’ only beingten minutes long (the "It took him a lifetime to write THIS?" mantra) Ithink I’ll scream. Did it ever occur to anybody that what we heard wasonlya small part of a much larger work? Most classical and semi-classicalpieces occur in (get ready) MOVEMENTS! It’s entirely possible that weonlyheard the prologue to a much larger piece. Think outside the box,people. As for the quality of the piece itself, I found it to be acceptable, ifnotthe most dynamic piece of work I’ve ever heard. But seeing as how we hadbeen hearing snippets of this piece THROUGHOUT THE MOVIE, I can’t say thatIwas so overwhelmingly let down as some of our more ‘educated and refined’musician types that have posted here. Sure, there were some flaws. Ms. Headly is not the greatest actress intheworld, and beside Dreyfuss she’s downright embarrassing. William Macy’scharacter is so cliched that it warrants no further discussion. The wholesubplot with Rowena and her romantic interest in Mr. Holland ran about tenminutes too long. And the ending bit where the arts funding gets cutseemeda little too political. But overall, a great film, surely one of Dreyfuss’ best, and one of myfavorite films. I’m a musician. And I liked it. So sue me…. 5) The writing of this movie by Patrick Sheane Duncan (Nick of Time),nominated for an Oscar and Golden Globe Awards, is one of the best storiesthat Hollywood ever put on the screen. The sensitivity and perception of theDirector Stephen Herek (101 Dalmatians) adds a special touch to the story. Richard Dreyfuss (The Goodbye Girl, The Competition, The AmericanPresident) was nominated for an Oscar and Golden Globe for this role, whichis my view one of his best performances. He is good in all stages of thedifferent seasons of the life of Mr. Holland. I seldom cry while watching amovie, but when Mr. Holland enters the school auditorium with grey hair andthe entire school is applauding when he retires, it makes me cry. I cryevery time I watch it, and I can also cry every time I bring it to mind. IfI ever get a part where I have to cry all I have to do is to bring backthat memory back! That moment is a combination of my mother a music teacherand my dad aging. There is no greater love than to lay your life foranother… When I graduated from college I wrote a letter thanking myparents for the rainy days they had to go to work, and for all thesacrifices they made for me and left it on top of the dining room table sothey could find when I was not around. Needless to say that the entirefamily cried. That is what that scene means to me. I do not see Mr. Hollandas a frustrated composer, he was just frustrated because he had othercommitments that did not give him the time to compose. Glenne Headly did agreat job playing Iris Holland. She has appeared in ER recently. OlympiaDukakis (Steel Magnolias) plays Principal Jacobs. It is beautiful whenclose to her retirement she gives Mr. Holland a gift. Jean Louisa Kell (TheDay Lincoln Was Shot) is Rowena Morgan who steals the show because she singsbeautifully. William H. Macy, (Fargo) plays Vice Principal Wolters who goesinsane when he listens popular music coming from Mr. Holland’s classroom.Poor Gertrude Lang, Alicia Witt ("Cybill") is trying so hard to get thetechnique that she forgets about her feelings. I love when she finally getsto feel the piece and lets herself go.Then when she comes back as grown upis very touching.A music teacher having a deaf child is ironic. Mr. Holland teaching thekids about Beethoven is marvelous! I love when Cole (Anthony Natale (II)),comes back as an adult and participates in the celebration of his dad’sretirement, and also because he himself is going to teach at the school forthe deaf in Washington DC. This movie struck a cord with me because of themusic and because of all the elements that were brought into movie andstory. I would give it a10 + if I could. It is one of my favorite dramas! Iam not much of a drama person, I prefer comedy, but this is a very specialdrama. 6) I remember seeing "Mr. Holland’s Opus" for the first time in high school. Iliked it then, and still do. Films about teaching often involve tough kidsand less than ideal teachers, among other things. I have to say this filmis an exception. Mr. Holland is an inspiration in so many ways that he doesnot realize or even want to acknowledge. It is also a story that could havetaken place and that some people can relate to. This is why I enjoyed it somuch. Mr. Holland has a dream of composing a very memorable and moving symphony,and to ultimately be "rich and famous." But working odd jobs in pursuit ofhis dream doesn’t appeal to him. Reluctantly, he takes a day job as a highschool music teacher to support the family and at first hates it. Hisstudents are not motivated to learn through readings and tests, and do notrespond well to the music of Bach. When he finds they love rock and roll, heintegrates this into the curriculum, much of the disapproval of theadministration, who believe "rock and roll by its very nature leads to abreakdown in discipline." He teaches and mentors many students over theyears, from a clarinet student who doubts her talent and feels inferior toher musically talented family, to a wrestler who becomes a drummer, and atalented singer with her eye on him who wants to go to Broadway despite anybarriers. Whether or not he knows it, Mr. Holland inspires them to dosomething worthwhile. Despite his love and talent for teaching, Mr. Holland cannot develop thissame level of rapport and love with his wife Iris and son Cole, who is deaf.His desire for Cole to appreciate music is outweighed by Cole’s inability tohear and his father’s reluctance to help him. Cole learns sign language fromhis teachers and mother predominantly. Mr. Holland appears to be the kind ofperson who detests imperfection of any kind, and this strains his familialrelationships. Gradually, though, he learns to accept and deal with thesechallenges, and becomes more loving and appreciative. I recommend "Mr. Holland’s Opus" for musicians, singers, music teachers, andreally everyone. Enjoy the show! 7) What a wonderful movie. I just watched it and am in awe of RichardDreyfuss’ amazing acting. Only being 15 but an avid music lover myself,I sat there wishing I had a teacher like Mr. Holland that inspired melike so many of the students in the movie, that made learning fun byconnecting with the students, by doing everything Mr. Holland did. Thestories of the students were real and believable. I connected with thegirl that played the clarinet, Gertrude Lang, because sometimes I evenfeel that I’m never good at anything. Every person of every age can appreciate and love this movie. At theend, when Mr. Holland’s goodbye party was discovered in the gym and hetook the stage, I was crying. What a wonderful movie. History-wise, music-wise, and story-wise. How often does a film come out that generations relate to; and a film sotouching about a teacher who cares about his students, and vice versa? Willalways be one of my favorite films. 9) Glenn Holland is a young composer. In the fifties he stops touring with hisband to teach music in a school which he hopes will free him from touring toallow him to work on his main love of composing his own music. Despiteinitially hating his job, Holland soon learns to enjoy it and how best tocommunicate the love of music to his pupils. We trace his life over30-40years as he has a son with his wife and goes through great emotionaltimes while putting his personal dreams to one side. Although this had `sentimental life lesson film’ written all over it, Istill wanted to give it a go and strangely still enjoyed it. The film isvery much a bit of praise for all those who are unsung heroes in there livesand it had the potential to be really sickly sentimental. Happily a goodscript manages to avoid this for the majority of the time. The weakness of the film is the fact it that it does try to cover a lifetimeand occasionally there isn’t enough plot to do that well. I know it wouldhave been difficult but I do feel that the film could have been either alittle tighter or filled to overflowing with plot to make it feel shorter. As it is it is still enjoyable but it does feel a little wandering at times– but I guess that’s like life in a way. When the climax comes though it ishard not to be a little moved by the lesson that the film is teachingus. However, the reason for the success of the film is also the reason for it’sOscar nomination – Richard Dreyfuss on good form. He kept me watching evenwhen the material was stretched. He is totally believable in the role – fora microcosm of his performance watch his face when the announcement is madeabout the surprise they have prepared for him – his emotion got me rightaway! He deserved his nomination for this as he is captivating over thewhole film. He even ages very convincingly and make up should becongratulated. However while makeup were concentrating on Dreyfuss theytotally forgot about Headly who doesn’t age a bit until the final timeperiod (apart from looking a bit tired). She is badly miscast and shedoesn’t fit the role at all. Thomas, Macy, Dukakis and Anderson (as theteenage Cole) all do well in support – but this is Dreyfuss’movie. Overall I enjoyed this. I usually struggle with things like this becausethey pile the sentiment on thick like a daytime TVM. Happily this scriptavoids that are the majority of the flaws are compensated for by a strongperformance from Dreyfuss. 10) After wanting to see this film since it came out, I finally was lucky enoughto see it tonight. As a music lover, this film blessed my soul. The scorewas gorgeous, and the struggles and victories of Mr. Holland made melaugh..made me cry and warmed my heart. Richard Dreyfuss was glorious in hisperformance as the troubled Music Teacher. He showed that anyone, be they ayoung girl who struggles to be good at something, or a teen in the 60′s whowants to play the drums but can’t find the beat..can be changed by music.Bravo, Mr. Holland! |
|
Lamb Chop and the Haunted Studio
| Title: | Lamb Chop and the Haunted Studio |
| Year: | 1994 |
| Rating: | 6.3 | 21 votes |
| Languages: | English |
| Color: | Color |
| Country: | Canada | USA |
| Company: | Paragon Entertainment Corporation |
| Comments: | |
| 1) I remember watching this when I was in 1st or 2nd grade. My mom told methatit was on at 8:00 pm and I tought that it was strange. So I stayed up andwatched the entire thing until 9:00, which was way past my bedtime backthen. Lamb Chop is my childhood, and this is one of the shows that Iremember. Lamb Chop and the Haunted Studio, which back then was scary. Ithad a special guest appearance by Alan Thicke (from Growing Pains, who I’veheard was a close friend of Shari Lewis.) They don’t really do things likethis anymore and that’s too bad for the children.
2) This program aired on PBS on October 21, 1994 at 8:00 P.M.There was a part where Alan Thicke was wearing a wardrobe, putting make-upon, in a dressing room.I wish this show would air again.Watching this show was like being on an inclined train or "roller coaster"as most know it as, where you never knew what would happennext. |
|
Mr. Hobbs Takes a Vacation
| Title: | Mr. Hobbs Takes a Vacation |
| Year: | 1962 |
| Tagline: | Jimmy Takes A Vacation You Have All The Fun! |
| Directors: | Henry Koster |
| Writers: | Edward Streeter (novel)
Nunnally Johnson (screenplay |
| Rating: | 6.8 | 1,484 votes |
| Languages: | English |
| Color: | Color |
| Country: | USA |
| Company: | Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation |
| Genres: | Comedy | Family |
| Plot: | |
| 1) Roger Hobbs is a harried city dweller who longs to take his family to the seashore for a vacation. He and his wife Peggy do get the family to the sand, but new problems develop there, and the vacation turns out to be a mixed blessing. 2) |
|
| Trivia: | |
|
|
| Goofs: | |
|
|
| Comments: | |
| 1) "Mr. Hobbs Takes A Vacation" is one of the most enjoyable family filmsever made. When it was released back in 1962, it was a big hit. But ifyou are a sophisticate, don’t write it off just yet. The plot issimple: Harried St. Louis banker Roger Hobbs (James Stewart) is lookingforward to a quiet, romantic vacation with his wife Peggy (MaureenO’Hara) who, unknown to him, has instead opted for a family reunion ina rented Northern California beach house. Not only has she included herteenage daughter Katie and younger son Danny but her married daughtersand their families as well. The beach house turns out to be amonstrosity which Hobbs describes as "Dragonwyck". When their daughterSusan and her husband Stan show up with their bratty kids, thingsquickly get worse. The family is complete when daughter Jane and herhusband Byron arrive with their infant daughter. By now, both Mr. andMrs. Hobbs are somewhat disenchanted with this "family reunion" asSusan and her husband fight until he walks out on them, while Jane’shusband takes up with the local bathing suit-clad vamp Manika. DaughterKatie meanwhile, grows more sullen by the day, sulking because of hernew braces and brother Danny simply glues himself to the televisionset. Add an unhappy Finnish maid and you really have a recipe fordisaster. But thanks to the delightful performance by Stewart, thelaughs come thick and fast. His dry wit enlivens the film and almostsingle-handedly keeps it alive. And I mean alive because in spite of acapable cast including Fabian, John McGiver and Marie Wilson, the filmbelongs to Stewart. He does wonders with his hapless father role andkeeps the audience in his corner every second. With the support of theeternally beautiful O’Hara (who’s hardly anyones idea of a grandmother)and a memorable Henry Mancini score, "Mr. Hobbs" may depict a harrowing"vacation" but it’s one the the viewer will thoroughly enjoy taking.The film has just been released on a beautiful widescreen DVD, with anoriginal trailer and a few other extras. Bon Voyage!
2) I think this highly entertaining film is a bit better than Maltin gives itcredit for being. More than just a light comedy about the travails of asummer vacation gone wrong, the movie has some hard edges that give it somebite. Among these are the frayed relationships between Hobbs and his elderdaughters, the marital difficulties of one of them (bordering almost onbeing painful to watch), and the mutually hostile relationship of Hobbs withhis grandson. Hobbs is no kindly buffoon; a well-meaning but irasciblefellow, he has plenty of cutting and sarcastic comments for the familymembers that cause him so much grief, yet who he obviously cares for. Thereare some genuinely touching moments throughout the film, especially as Hobbsreconnects with his teen son. The script is excellent, with many sharp edgesand plenty of crackling repartee. Stewart, in a fine performance, makes themovie; his expressive face completely reflects the frustrations, disasters,and surprises he encounters, as well as the warmth and pride he feels forhis family. The brief narrative voiceovers he supplies (continuations of theletter he dictates at the beginning of the whole flashback movie) arewell-placed and witty. Maureen O’Hara is perfect as the well-meaning Mrs.Hobbs. This is a thoroughly enjoyable 60′s movie that stands up well to thepassing years. 3) All-round pleasant family fare for those who enjoy the ups and downs offamily happenings. This easygoing story appeals to both young and old. RogerHobbs (Jimmy Stewart) is the harried father who longs for a quiet holidaywith his wife (Maureen O’Hara) but in the end goes along with her wish tohave a family reunion, which turns out to be far from ideal. Quite thecontrary, there’s plenty of room for a good dose of realism — personalclashes between his married daughter Susan and husband Stan, while theyoungsters get out of control. Scarcely a dull moment throughout. Fabian, asJoe, is a nice addition to the scene and he’s more mature here than in hisearlier movie, which I happen to like best, "North to Alaska." An oldfamiliar face is Reginald Gardiner, as Reggie, who has been a part ofcountless film comedies dating back to the 1930s. Settle down with somepopcorn and have a good time! 4) This is an old-fashioned movie about a married couple’s attempt to bringtheir distant family back together. It’s not raunchy, violent or nasty,andits depiction of a mum, dad and children living in a "nuclear" family mayseem quaintly out-dated, but Stewart and O’Hara provide warmth and depth.Based on a book by Edward (‘Father of the Bride’) Streeter, Mr Hobbs isoneof this American author’s typical small-town, upper-middle class heroeswhothe whole world and his wife (and Mr Hobbs’s own wife)are out to get.Simplemechanical devices, plumbers and visiting luminaries’ wives all spelltrouble, but somehow Mr Hobbs comes through to win the day. Not thegreatestfilm ever, but for anyone who grew up in the early 60s and wants areminderof how simple life seemed back then, this is a good film towatch. 5) Mr. Hobbs Takes A Vacation is delightful from beginning to end. It’s avacation none of us would mind taking. Mr. and Mrs. Hobbs are somewhat"with it" parents, with a child in each generation, young and old, eachwiththeir own problems. They grow up so quickly. Mrs. Hobbs uses the excuseofa summer vacation, in a shack of a shore house, to bring them all closertogether before their individual roads (which they are already traveling)lead them further away from "home". The rental home is a shambles and the "family" doesn’t cooperate with "theplan". Leave it to the "deadpan" Stewart, problem solver and loving dad,toclose the gap with each child (and their own broods), and re-unite themallback into one big, happy family. Stewart plays the most unimportant member of the family, DAD, for all it’sworth. Nicknamed "Boom-pa" ("Boom-pa, couldn’t you do better for your oldman?" jokingly(?) insulted) by one of his grandchildren, birdwatching with John McGiver ("What kind of bird is that?"..always a"Barn Swallow"), and playing with his temperamental Rube Goldberg waterpump, Stewart is the centerpiece to this amusing and warm film. (Maureenplays a really sexy grandma too…) PS— FABIAN, as the teenaged love interest of Mr.Hobb’s daughter (the onewith the "new" braces on her teeth), gets to sing too. The "little summerromance" is a plus for his many female fans. 6) This is a very nice movie, but it could have been more. The scenes betweenStewart and O’Hara are some of the best (and funniest) scenes I’ve ever seenportraying and affectionate, mature married couple. One of my favoritemoments is when Mrs. Hobbs asks her husband, "What did you tell him I had,dementia praecox?" You don’t get dialogue and delivery like thatanymore… The thing that mars the movie is that either the people making the moviedidn’t realize how wonderful the scenes between O’Hara and Stewart were, orthey worried about some stupid demographic junk and silted the movie up with"youth appeal". Most of the scenes with the teenage daughter could have beencut, especially the awful scene where Fabian sings, and the sequence wherehe goes sailing with his son should have been tightened. But the scenes with the two parents (especially the ones in the bedroomwhere they discuss their sons-in-law and the house), and Stewart’soccasional morbid fantasies make this movie a winner. I think with a littlemore care it could have been a classic, but it’s well worth seeing, and youcan fast-forward over the scene at the pizza shop where Fabiansings. 7) This has been one of my favorite movies, ever since seeing it at thedrive-in when I was eleven. I started holding my mouth just like Katey(pretending I had braces), and dreaming that I, too, would meet Fabianon our family vacation. I still find myself humming "Cream puff,shortcake, sweet stuff, jelly rolls….". And Henry Mancini’ssoundtrack still is great beach music. All grown up now, my business is renting beach houses, a vocationpartially stimulated by my favorite summer movie. I can’t help butcompare the old beach shack full of cobwebs and broken plumbing totoday’s sand castles. This video belongs in every modern beach house,to bring back memories of vacations long ago, or to show the kids howwe roughed it in the olden days. 9) I saw Mr. Hobbs Takes A Vacation after reading a book about Dwight D.Eisenhower in which the author points out that the last time the sixEisenhower brothers got together with their parents in the same spotwas 1926 and has a picture in the book that commemorates the event.When I saw my VHS of this film it did give me an appreciation of whatJames Stewart was trying to do here. This film is a pleasant innocuous family comedy from a more innocenttime, one of three that James Stewart did with Director Henry Koster inthe Sixties. The other two were Take Her She's Mine and Dear Brigitte.Previously Stewart had done Harvey and No Highway with Koster whichmakes Koster the director he did the second amount of films with, firstbeing Anthony Mann. Maureen O'Hara liked the film and said so in her memoirs. However shegot off to a rocky start in this film because Stewart at first treatedher very coldly. When she questioned him why it turned out that JohnFord had bad mouthed her to Stewart. A lot of her memoirs are devotedto her up and down relationship with Ford. When the air got cleared,Mr. Hobbs was an enjoyable experience for her. Basically what the film is that Stewart and O'Hara rent an old barn ofa house located on a California beach and there's room enough for them,the two kids still at home and two married daughters with spouses andfamilies. So the entire Hobbs extended family moves in for the summerand it's one situation after another with problems with appliances andrelationships and a pair of officious guests, Marie Wilson and JohnMcGiver who are the best in the supporting cast. 20th Century Fox secured the teen box office by getting the services ofFabian to appear in this film. Fabian was very big back in the day as acreated teen age idol of admittedly limited singing ability who verywisely transitioned into straight acting. They still gave him a songhere though one of Henry Mancini and Johnny Mercer's lesser creationsto sing with Cindy Carol. Fabian would within two years be eclipsed byThe Beatles and the British invasion. Nevertheless he sold a fewtickets for this film although adults would have to wait for the filmto be out for several weeks before seeing it in order to hear thedialog. Nothing Shakespearean in that, but it's still a pleasant enough filmand nothing anyone had to be ashamed of. 10) "Mr. Hobbs Takes a Vacation" is the best of the 60's Jimmy Stewarwtfamily father doesn't know best films, much more palatable than thecreepy and antiquated "Take Her, She's Mine", where Jimmy worries morethan is healthy about Sandra Dee's virginity and where insipid folksongs are considered raunchy and subversive. "Hobbs" will appeal toeveryone, from Baby Boomers nostalgic about their childhood, to thegreatest generation, who will enjoy Stewart and O'Hara as famousactors, and Gen X's and Y's, if they're hip enough, will appreciate how"cool" Jimmy is. For some inexplicable and annoying reason O'Hara callsher husband "Rog" in that Madison Avenue shorthand way, as though shewere a W.A.S.P. executive telling him he's just been fired. MarieWilson and John McGiver as the eccentric couple are priceless; theirscenes with Stewart are hilarious. And for an unexpected poignantmoment, the scene in the boat with Stewart and his son is lovely. Afterwatching an eclipse, the son says they should watch the next onetogether in about 30 years. The expression on Stewart's face, with it'sintimations of mortality, is just beautiful. Fabian of course is thrownin for the demographic, but can be tolerated, though I couldn't standthe actress who played the daughter Katey. I recommend "Hobbs" forinclusion in a Jimmy Stewart collection, if only for that boat scene. |
|